In the context of the subjective nature of historical events, contrast the American and Mexican perspectives on the Monroe Doctrine. Which popular statement typifies the difference between the perspectives?

In the context of the subjective nature of historical events, contrast the American and Mexican perspectives on the Monroe Doctrine. Which popular statement typifies the difference between the perspectives?



Citizens of the United States feel they have been good neighbors. They see the Monroe Doctrine as protection for Latin America from European colonization and the intervention of Europe in the governments of the Western Hemisphere. 


Latin Americans, in contrast, tend to see the Monroe Doctrine as an offensive expression of U.S. influence in Latin America. To put it another way, "Europe keep your hands off—Latin America is only for the United States," an attitude perhaps typified by former U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant, who, in a speech in Mexico in 1880, described Mexico as a "magnificent mine" that lay waiting south of the border for North American interests. 


The following statement typifies the difference in the perspectives. Most Americans would agree with President John F. Kennedy's proclamation during a visit to Mexico that "Geography has made us neighbors, tradition has made us friends." North Americans may be surprised to learn that most Mexicans felt it more accurate to say "Geography has made us closer, tradition has made us far apart."


Learn More :

GLOBAL MARKETING

Learn More Multiple Choice Question :